1 | Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss and Cang Hu All-uses vs mutation testing: An experimental comparison of effectiveness Journal of Systems and Software, 38(3), 1997. |
|
| Abstract: Available soon... |
| @ARTICLE{FranklWH97,
author = {Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss and Cang Hu},
title = {All-uses vs mutation testing: An experimental comparison of effectiveness},
journal = {Journal of Systems and Software},
year = {1997},
month = {},
volume = {38},
number = {3},
pages = {235--253}
} |
2 | Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss and Cang Hu All-uses vs Mutation Testing: an Experimental Comparison of Effectiveness Journal of Systems and Software, 38(3), September 1997. |
|
| Abstract: The effectiveness of a test data adequacy criterion for a given program and specification is the probability that a test set satisfying the criterion will expose a fault. Experiments were performed to compare the effectiveness of the mutation testing and all-uses test data adequacy criteria at various coverage levels, for randomly generated test sets. Large numbers of test sets were generated and executed, and for each, the proportion of mutants killed or def-use associations covered was measured. This data was used to estimate and compare the effectiveness of the criteria. The results were mixed: at the highest coverage levels considered, mutation was more effective than all-uses for five of the nine subjects, all-uses was more effective than mutation for two subjects, and there was no clear winner for two subjects. However, mutation testing was much more expensive than all-uses. The relationship between coverage and effectiveness for fixed-sized test sets was also explored and was found to be nonlinear and, in many cases, nonmonotonic. |
| @ARTICLE{FranklWH97,
author = {Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss and Cang Hu},
title = {All-uses vs Mutation Testing: an Experimental Comparison of Effectiveness},
journal = {Journal of Systems and Software},
year = {1997},
month = {September},
volume = {38},
number = {3},
pages = {235-253}
} |
3 | Vladimir N. Fleyshgakker and Stewart N. Weiss Efficient Mutation Analysis: A New Approach Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA'94)Seattle, Washington, August 1994. |
|
| Abstract: Available soon... |
| @INPROCEEDINGS{FleyshgakkerW94,
author = {Vladimir N. Fleyshgakker and Stewart N. Weiss},
title = {Efficient Mutation Analysis: A New Approach},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis (ISSTA'94)},
year = {1994},
address = {Seattle, Washington},
month = {August},
pages = {185-195}
} |
4 | Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss and Cang Hu All-Uses Versus Mutation Testing: An Experimental Comparison of Effectiveness Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, New York, 1994. |
|
| Abstract: Available soon... |
| @TECHREPORT{FranklWH94,
author = {Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss and Cang Hu},
title = {All-Uses Versus Mutation Testing: An Experimental Comparison of Effectiveness},
institution = {Polytechnic University},
year = {1994},
type = {techreport},
number = {},
address = {Brooklyn, New York},
month = {},
} |
5 | Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss An Experimental Comparison of the Effectiveness of Branch Testing and Data Flow Testing {IEEE} Trans. Software Eng., 19(8), 1993. |
|
| Abstract: Available soon... |
| @ARTICLE{FranklW93a,
author = {Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss},
title = {An Experimental Comparison of the Effectiveness of Branch Testing and Data Flow Testing},
journal = {{IEEE} Trans. Software Eng.},
year = {1993},
month = {},
volume = {19},
number = {8},
pages = {774--787}
} |
6 | Stewart N. Weiss and Vladimir N. Fleyshgakker Improved Serial Algorithms for Mutation Analysis ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, 18(3), July 1993. |
|
| Abstract: Available soon... |
| @ARTICLE{WeissF93,
author = {Stewart N. Weiss and Vladimir N. Fleyshgakker},
title = {Improved Serial Algorithms for Mutation Analysis},
journal = {ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes},
year = {1993},
month = {July},
volume = {18},
number = {3},
pages = {149-158}
} |
7 | Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss An Experimental Comparison of the Effectiveness of the All-Uses and All-Edges Adequacy Criteria Symposium on Testing, Analysis, and Verification, 1991. |
|
| Abstract: Available soon... |
| @INPROCEEDINGS{FranklW91,
author = {Phyllis G. Frankl and Stewart N. Weiss},
title = {An Experimental Comparison of the Effectiveness of the All-Uses and All-Edges Adequacy Criteria},
booktitle = {Symposium on Testing, Analysis, and Verification},
year = {1991},
address = {},
month = {},
pages = {154--164}
} |